JJMLL » JJMLL Issues

 

 Jordanian Journals
Home
Editorial Board
International Advisory Board
Scope and Description
Manuscript Submission
Manuscript Organization  
Publication Ethics  
Copyright  
Offprints  
Disclaimer  
JJMLL Issues  
Contact Address

 

      

     
   

The “Vernacular Process” and the (Re)construction of Tradition

in Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man

 

 

Abstract

 

The present paper is an attempt to explore, in and through the prism of Ralph W. Ellison’s Invisible Man (1952), the workings of Ellison’s “vernacular process” as a concept that informs the author’s critical views incorporated in the novel. More specifically, Ellison’s revisionary enterprise in this narrative demonstrates his view of African-American tradition as integrated in American and Western tradition. While the form of “invisible criticism” in which Ellison engages is a rather self-conscious manifestation of his critical model of the “vernacular process,” the present work contends that this Ellisonian model actually foreshadows Henry Louis Gates Jr.’s critical paradigm of “Signifyin(g).” What Gates names “literary Signification” stands for an indigenous African-American form of literary revision consisting in a black text’s repeating with difference of another black text’s tropes or rhetorical strategies, or such text’s appropriation of aspects of form in a white antecedent text. Through “literary Signification,” Invisible Man revises African-American texts exemplified in the present article by Richard Wright’s Black Boy (1945) and Native Son (1940). Likewise, Ellison’s narrative also revisits American and European texts, an enterprise to be seen in the present work’s examination of Ellison’s revision of James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916), Walt Whitman’s romantic poetry, and T.S Eliot’s The Waste Land (1922). By establishing through “literary Signification” his African-American literary “relatives” as well as his Western and American “ancestors,” Ellison ultimately constructs the African-American literary tradition as embedded in the Euro-American tradition and thus underlines the syncretic character of American literature and culture.

Keywords: Integrative, Revision, Tradition, Signifyin(G), “Vernacular Process”.

Authors: Lahoussine Hamdoune

Doi: https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.13.4.3

 

Cited by: Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures (JJMLL), 2021, 13 (4): 645-663

 

Full text

 

 

References

Blake, Susan. 1986. Ritual and rationalization: Black folklore in the works of Ralph Ellison. Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, ed. Harold Bloom, 89-90. New York: Chelsea House.

Chester, Alfred and Vilma Howard. 1995. The art of Fiction: An Interview.  Conversations

        with Ralph Ellison, ed. Maryemm Graham and Amritjit Singh, 6-19. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

Ellison, Ralph Waldo. 1965. Invisible Man. New York: Penguin Books.

Gates, Henry Louis, Jr. 1988. The Signifyin(g) Monkey : A Theory of African-American Literary Criticism. New York, Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Gilroy, Paul. 1993. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. New York & London: Verso.

Hutcheon, Linda. 2006. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge.

Joyce, James. 2000. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lee, Kun-Jong. 2000. Ellison’s Variations on American Themes.  The Critical Response to Ralph Ellison, ed. Robert J. Butler. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.

Lyne, William. 1999. The Signifyin(g) Modernist: Ralph Ellison and the Limits of Double Consciousness. Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man, ed. Harold Bloom. Philadelphia: Chelsea

 House. 179-96.

Nadel, Alan. 2004. The integrated Literary Tradition. In A Historical Guide to Ralph Ellison, ed. Steven C. Tracy. Oxford &New York : OUP.

Nadel, Alan. 1988. Invisible Criticism: Ralph Ellison and the American Canon. Iowa City : University of Iowa Press. Print.

Reed, Thomas Vernon. 1992. Fifteen Jugglers, Five Believers: Literary Politics and the Poetics of American Social Movements. Berkeley:  University of California Press.

Sanders, Julie. 2006. Adaptation and Appropriation. London: Routledge.

Sanders, Julie. 2010. Adaptation and appropriation. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/hub-

       assets/pericles/logo-header-1526603583437.png https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444337815.wbeotna001. Accessed 8 Oct., 2020.

Steele, Meili. 1996. Language and African-American culture: the need for meta-philosophical reflection. Philosophy Today 40. 179+.www.questia.com. Web. Accessed 18 Nov., 2018.

Stepto, Robert B. and Harper Michael S. 2000. Study and Experience: An Interview with Ralph Ellison. The Critical Response to Ralph Ellison, ed. Robert J. Butler. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.

Robert B. Stepto. 1979. From behind the Veil : A Study of Afro-American Narrative. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Wright, Richard. 1984. How Bigger Was Born. Introduction to Native Son. Harmondsworth, Middlesex:  Penguin Books.

Wright, Richard. 1984. Native Son. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.

Wright, Richard. 1993. Black boy. New York: Harper Perennial. Print.

 

Copyright © 2006-2021. All Rights Reserved, Yarmouk University