JJMLL » JJMLL Issues

 

 Jordanian Journals
Home
Editorial Board
International Advisory Board
Scope and Description
Manuscript Submission
Manuscript Organization  
Publication Ethics  
Copyright  
Offprints  
Disclaimer  
JJMLL Issues  
Contact Address

 

      

     
 

 

Antonym Sequence in Qur’anic Arabic: An Emically Etiological Approach

 

Abstract

 

This article etiologically examines which principles pattern and govern antonym sequences in the Qur’anic discourse and why antonymous pair members are prone to a particularly regular order in the Qur’an. To conduct a rigorous analysis, the article builds on Jones’s (2002) analytic toolkit for antonym sequence (Chapter 8, 120-137) and tests it on a dataset manually collected from the Qur’an (1420 antonymous pairs). The toolkit accounts for antonym order in language use according to sequence rules which include morphology, positivity, magnitude, chronology, gender, phonology, idiomaticity, frequency, and markedness. The results showed that most of these rules are retrievable and replicable across Qur’anic Arabic, with, however, both quantitative and qualitative variations due to the peculiarly idiosyncratic nature of the Qur’an. Given that not all these sequential rules are applicable, new ones were developed: context, end-rhyme, and distance. The general conclusion is that Qur’anic antonym sequences are ruled by rigorous principles that are sometimes overruled for teleological reasons.

Keywords: Qur’anic Arabic, Antonym Sequence, Emic Typology, Etiological Approach.

Authors: Hamada Hassanein

Doi: https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.15.1.11

 

Cited by: Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures (JJMLL) 2023, 15 (1): 199-220

 

Full text

 

 

References

Abdel Haleem, M.A.S. 2018. The Role of Context in Interpreting and Translating the Qur’an. Journal of Qur’anic Studies 20 (1): 47–66.

Abdul-Raof, Hussein. 2001. Qur’an Translation: Discourse, Texture and Exegesis. Richmond: Curzon.

Abdul-Raof, Hussein. 2019. Text Linguistics of Qur’anic Discourse: An Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.

Akşehirli, Soner. 2018. Ancillary Antonymy in Turkish. Journal of Language Education and Research 4 (1): 41-60.

Al-?A:lu:si:, Shiha:b ad-Di:n. 1995. Ru:h al-Maca:ni: (1st ed.). Beirut: Da:r al-Kutub al-cIlmiyya.

AlHedayani, Rukayah. 2016. Antonymy in Modern Standard Arabic. PhD diss., University of Sussex.

Al-Jurja:ni:, cAbdul-Qa:hir. 2000. Dala:?il al-Icja:z. Ed. by M. M. Sha:kir. Cairo: Maktabat al-Kha:nji:.

Al-Qamma:sh, cAbdul-Rahma:n. 2012. Al-Ha:wi: fi: Tafsi:r al-Qur?a:n al-Kari:m. Al-Maktaba ash-Sha:mila. https://al-maktaba.org/book/31618/47509

Ar-Ra:zī, Muhammad. 1981. Tafsi:r al-Fakhr ar-Ra:zi: (1st ed.). Beirut: Da:r al-Fikr.

As-Samirra:?i:, Fa:dil. 2003. Lamasa:t Baya:niyya fi: Nusu:s min at-Tanzi:l (3rd ed.). Amman: Da:r cAmma:r.

Az-Zamakhshari:, cUmar. 1998. Al-Kashsha:f (1st Ed.). Rev. by cA:dil cAbdul-Mawju:d and cAli: Mucawwad. Riyadh: Maktabat al-cUbayka:n.

Bennet, Clinton. 2010. Interpreting the Qur’an: A Guide for the Uninitiated. London: Continuum.

Cap, Piotr. 2008. Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17-41.

Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Charles, Walter G., and George A. Miller. 1989. Contexts of Antonymous Adjectives. Applied Psycholinguistics 10: 357-375.

Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.

Deese, James. 1965. The Structure of Associations in Language and Thought. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Fellbaum, Christiane. 1995. Co-occurrence and Antonymy. International Journal of Lexicography 8 (4): 281–303.

Gheltofan, Daniela. 2013. Functional Categories of Antonymy in Romanian. Paper presented at the Second International Colloquium Communication and Culture in European Romania (CICCRE II), September 24-25, in Szeged, Hungary.

Hassanein, Hamada. 2013. The Lexical Semantics of Antonymy in the Qur’an: A Linguistic Study. PhD diss., Benha University.

Hassanein, Hamada. 2018. Discourse Functions of Opposition in Classical Arabic: The Case in Ḥadīth Genre.” Lingua 201: 18-44.

Hassanein, Hamada. 2020a. Ten Paradigms of Ancillary Antonymy: Evidence from Classical Arabic. Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts 80 (8): 35-95.

Hassanein, Hamada. 2020b. Identical Twins, Different Wombs: A Literature Review on Attiba:q in Arabic and Antonymy in English. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 20 (2): 7-40.

Hassanein, Hamada. 2021a. Ancillary Antonyms: Syntagms and Paradigms from Arabic. Applied Linguistics Research Journal 5 (2): 101-112.

Hassanein, Hamada. 2021b. A Taxonomy of Antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi Proverbs in Comparison. Open Linguistics 7 (1): 200-222.

Hatim, Basil, and Jeremy Munday. 2004. Translation: An Advanced Resource Book. London and New York: Routledge.

Hsu, Chan-Chia. 2015. A Syntagmatic Analysis of Antonym Co-occurrences in Chinese: Contrastive Constructions and Co-occurrence Sequences. Corpora 10 (1): 47-82.

Hsu, Chan-Chia. 2019. A Corpus-based Study on the Functions of Antonym Co-occurrences in Spoken Chinese. Text and Talk 39 (4): 535–561.

Ibn cA:shu:r, Muhammad. 1984. Tafsi:r at-Tahri:r wa-t-Tanwi:r. Tunis: Ad-Da:r at-Tu:nisiyya li-n-Nashr.

Ibnul-Qayyim, M. al-Jawziyya. N.d. Tuhfat al-Mawdu:d fi: Ahka:m al-Mawlu:d. Ed. by cUthma:n Jumca Dumayriyya. Mecca: Da:r CA:lam al-Fawa:?id.

Jones, Steven. 2002. Antonymy: A Corpus-based Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.

Jones, Steven, and Lynne Murphy. 2005. Using Corpora to Investigate Antonymy Acquisition. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (3): 393–413.

Jones, Steven, M. Lynne Murphy, Carita Paradis, and Caroline Willners. 2012. Antonyms in English: Construals, Constructions and Canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Justeson, John S., and Slava M. Katz. 1991. Co-occurrences of Antonymous Adjectives and their Contexts. Computational Linguistics 17 (1): 1-19.

Justeson, John S. and Slava M. Katz. 1992. Redefining Antonymy: The Textual Structure of a Semantic Relation. Literary and Linguistic Computing 7: 176–84.

Kostić, Nataša. 2015. Antonym Sequence in Written Discourse: A Corpus-based Study. Language Sciences 47: 18-31.

Larkin, Margaret. 1982. Al-Jurjani's Theory of Discourse. Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics 2: 76-86.

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Martin, J. R. 2008. What Kind of Structure?—Interpersonal Meaning and Prosodic Realization across Strata. WORD 59 (2): 111-141.

Martin, Richard C. 1982. Understanding the Qur’an in Text and Context. History of Religions 21 (4): 361-384.

Meri, Josef W. (ed.). 2006. Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia (Vol. 1). London and New York: Routledge.

Mohamadi, Mandana Kolahdouz, Ali Reza Gholi Famian, Ferdows Aghagolzadeh, and Azita Afrashi. 2019a. Syntactic Frameworks and Discourse Functions of Lexical Antonymy in Persian Language. Scientific Journal of Language Research 11 (30): 149-177.

Mohamadi, Mandana Kolahdouz, Ali Reza Gholi Famian, and Ferdows Aghagolzadeh. 2019b. Antonym Sequence in Persian: A Corpus-Based Study. Linguistic Research 10 (1): 129-140.

Muehleisen, Victoria. 1997. Antonymy and semantic range in English. PhD diss., Northwestern University.

Muehleisen, Victoria, and Maho Isono. 2009. Antonymous Adjectives in Japanese Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11): 2185-2203.

Murphy, M. Lynne. 2006. “Antonyms as lexical constructions: or, why paradigmatic construction is not an oxymoron”. In Constructions all over: Case studies and theoretical implications, ed. Schönefeld, D., 1-8. Special Volume of Constructions SV.

Murphy, M. Lynne, and Steven Jones. 2008. Antonyms in Children's and Child-directed Speech. First Language 28 (4): 403-430.

Murphy, M. Lynne, Carita Paradis, Caroline Willners, and Steven Jones. 2009. Discourse Functions of Antonymy: A Cross-linguistic Investigation of Swedish and English. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11): 2159-2184.

Nida, Eugene A. 2001. Contexts in Translating. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Paradis, Carita, Caroline Willners, and Steven Jones. 2009. Good and Bad Antonyms: Using Textual and Experimental Methods to Measure Canonicity. The Mental Lexicon 4 (3): 380-429.

Steffens, Marie. 2018. Antonymic Discourse Functions and Manipulation: A Corpus Analysis of Present‑Day French. Corpus Pragmatics 2: 313–332.

Titone, Debra A., and Cynthia M. Connine. 1999. On the Compositional and Noncompositional Nature of Idiomatic Expression. Journal of Pragmatics 31 (12): 1655-1674.

Van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. Discourse, Context and Cognition. Discourse Studies 8 (1): 159-177.

Van de Weijer, Joost, Carita Paradis, Caroline Willners, and Magnus Lindgren. 2014. Antonym Canonicity: Temporal and Contextual Manipulations. Brain and Language 128: 1-8.

Wolf, George. 1989. Malinowski’s ‘Context of Situation’. Language & Communication 9 (4): 259-267.

Wu, Shuqiong. 2014. The Metonymic Interpretation of Chinese Antonym Co-occurrence Constructions: The Case of you X you Y. Language Sciences 45: 189-201.

Wu, Shuqiong. 2017. Iconicity and Viewpoint: Antonym Order in Chinese Four-character Patterns. Language Sciences 59: 117-134.

 

Copyright © 2006-2022. All Rights Reserved, Yarmouk University