JJMLL » JJMLL Issues

 

 Jordanian Journals
Home
Editorial Board
International Advisory Board
Scope and Description
Manuscript Submission
Manuscript Organization  
Publication Ethics  
Copyright  
Offprints  
Disclaimer  
JJMLL Issues  
Contact Address

 

      

     
   

The Prosodic Stylistics of John Gower’s “Tale of Jason and Medea”

  

 

Abstract

Against the perspective that Gower’s Confessio Amantis is monotonous due to its regular meters and plain diction, this paper views the Confessio’s apparently regular meters as the main foundation of a prosodic structure that imitates the flow and development of the narrative’s plot. The paper reads several excerpts from “the Tale of Jason and Medea”, a representative piece of the Confessio, highlighting the use of certain metrical devices, such as the iamb, trochee, end-stop, caesura, enjambment, metrical stanza or paragraph, anaphora, and onomatopoeia. These devices, I believe, are used by Gower to control the tempo of meters as well as plot development of the narrative, which showcases how the poet espouses elocutio (form) to inventio (content) in a way that reflects the rhetorical value of harmonizing the two main components of the narrative instead of sacrificing one in favor of the other. The paper concludes that the Confessio’s apparent regularity is creatively deceptive, as it prioritizes neither form nor content at the cost of each other, but uses the former to highlight the central theme or concern of the latter.

Keywords: Confessio Amantis, John Gower, prosody, Middle English poetry, stylistics, “Tale of Jason and Medea”

Authors: Malek J. Zuraikat

Doi: https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.15.4.20

 

Cited by: Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures (JJMLL) 2023, 15 (4): 1477-1497

 

Full text

 

References

Ando, Shinsuke. 1982. [Review of John Gower: “Confessio Amantis,” by M. Ito]. Medium Ævum 51 (2): 263–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/43628666

Boettcher, Marlene and Sabine Zerbian. 2020. Stressed Pronouns in Spontaneous English. 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody Proceedings, Japan: 131-135. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-27   

Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Accent Is Predictable (If You’re a Mind-Reader). Language 48(3): 633–644. https://doi.org/10.2307/412039

Byerly, Margaret Joan. 1967. A Comparison of Two Medieval Story-tellers: Geoffrey Chaucer and John Gower. Master Thesis. University of the Pacific https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/1630

Carlson, David R. 2014. Gower Agonistes and Chaucer on Ovid (And Virgil). The Modern Language Review 109 (4): 931–952. https://doi.org/10.5699/modelangrevi.109.4.0931

Carlson, David R. 2022. Gower and Anglo-Latin Verse. Rome: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies. 

Carey, Angela L. et al. 2015. Narcissism and the Use of Personal Pronouns Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000029

Child, F. J. 1873. Observations on the Language of Gower’s Confessio Amantis. (A Supplement to Observations on the Language of Chaucer, Memoirs of the Academy, New Series, Vol. VIII. Art. XVII). Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 9 (2): 265–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/25058004

Chiykowski, Peter. 2010. Chaucer, Gower, and What Medieval Women Want. Verso: An Undergraduate Journal of Literary Criticism [online]. https://www.medievalists.net/2013/03/chaucer-gower-and-what-medieval-women-want/

Cole, Andrew. 2017. John Gower Copies Geoffrey Chaucer. The Chaucer Review 52 (1): 46–65. https://doi.org/10.5325/chaucerrev.52.1.0046

Confessio Amantis. 2023. British Library. https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/confessio-amantis 

Cui-yun, Cai. 2008. The Features and Training of English Stress and Rhythm. US-China Education Review 5 (11): 61-65. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504969.pdf

Dauby, Hélène. 2011. From Trevet to Gower and Chaucer. Caliban: French Journal of English Studies 29: 79-88. https://doi.org/10.4000/caliban.732

Davis, Sally M. and Michael H. Kelly. 1997. Knowledge of the English Noun–Verb Stress Difference by Native and Nonnative Speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 36 (3): 445-460. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2503

Earle, John. 1892. The Philology of the English Tongue. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. 

Fisher, John. H. 1965. John Gower: Moral Philosopher and Friend of Chaucer. London: Methuen Publishing.

Fonzo, Kimberly. 2016. Richard II’s Publicly Prophesied Deposition in Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Modern Philology 114 (1): 1–17. https://doi:10.1086/686277  

Gastle, Brian. 2016. Gower and Chaucer. In The Routledge Research Companion to John Gower (1st ed.) by Ana Sáez-Hidalgo, Brian Gastle, & R.F. Yeager (Eds.), 296-311. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613109

Gower, John. 1980. Confessio Amantis. Edited by Russell A. Peck. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Irvin, Matthew W. 2021. Hengist’s Tongue: Remembering (Old) English in John Gower’s Confessio Amantis. In Writers, Editors and Exemplars in Medieval English Texts, ed. Sharon M. Rowley, 251-279. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55724-9_11

Jeffers, Regina. 2015.  John Gower, Medieval English Poet and Contemporary of William Langland and Geoffrey Chaucer. Every Woman Dreams. https://reginajeffers.blog/2015/12/04/john-gower-medieval-english-poet-and-contemporary-of-william-langland-and-geoffrey-chaucer/ 

Lewis, C.Staples. 1936. The Allegory of Love: A Study in Medieval Tradition. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. 

Mehl, Dieter. 2001. English Literature in the Age of Chaucer. Harlow: Longman

Middleton, Anne. 1978. The Idea of Public Poetry in the Reign of Richard II. Speculum 53 (1): 94–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2855608

Kameyama, Megumi. 1999. Stressed and Unstressed Pronouns: Complementary Preferences. In Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, eds. Peter Bosch, Rop van der Sandt, 306-321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nakatani, Christine. 1993. Accenting on Pronouns and Proper Names in Spontaneous Narrative. ESCA Workshop on Prosody: Working Papers 41, Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund, Sweden, 164-167. 

Nicholson, Peter, ed. 1991. Gower's Confessio Amantis: A Critical Anthology. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.

Pearsall, Derek. 1966. Gower’s Narrative Art. PMLA, 81(7), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.2307/461203

Peck, Russell A. 2004. Introduction. In: Gower, John. Confessio Amantis (Vol. 3). Michigan: Medieval Institute Publications [online]. https://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/text/peck-gower-confessio-amantis-volume-3-introduction

Phelan, W. S. 1971. The Conflict of Courtly Love and Christian Morality in John Gower’s Confessio Amantis. PhD diss., The Ohio State University. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_ etd/send_file/send?accession=osu1486725904124799&disposition=inline 

Stanbury, Sarah. 2002. Vernacular Nostalgia and The Cambridge History of Medieval English LiteratureTexas Studies in Literature and Language 44 (1): 92–107. http://www.jstor.n org/stable/40755354

Shaw, Judith Davis. 1984. ‘Lust’ and ‘Lore’ in Gower and Chaucer. The Chaucer Review 19 (2): 110–122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25093910

Schmolz, Helene. 2015. Anaphora Resolution and Text Retrieval: A Linguistic Analysis of Hypertexts. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter.

Urban, M. 2005. Poetics of the Past, Politics of the Present: Chaucer, Gower, and Old Books. PhD thesis, University of Wales. http://pure.aber.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/9826729/PoeticsOfThePast_Thesis.pdf

Urban, Malte. 2012. Cracks and Fissures: Gower’s Poetics on the Edge. ES. Revista de Filología Inglesa, 33 (1): 155-170. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4067941

Watt, Diane. 2003. Amoral Gower: Language, Sex, and Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Watt, Diane. 2009. John Gower. In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Literature 1100–1500 (Cambridge Companions to Literature), ed. Larry Scanlon, 153-164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weiskott, Eric. 2022.   Gower’s Quatrains: Language, Rhyme, Occasion. English Studies 103: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2022.2043032

Yeager, Robert. F. 1984. ‘O Moral Gower’: Chaucer’s Dedication of Troilus and Criseyde. The Chaucer Review 19 (2): 87–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25093908

Yeager, Robert. F. 1990. John Gower’s Poetics. The Search for A New Arion. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.

Yeager, Robert. F. 2010. The Poetry of John Gower. In A Companion to Medieval Poetry, ed.  Corinne Saunders, 476–495. Wiley-Blackwell. 

Zarins, Kim. 2016. Gower and Rhetoric. In The Routledge Research Companion to John Gower (1st ed.), eds. Ana Sáez-Hidalgo, Brian Gastle, and R.F. Yeager. 37-55. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613109.ch3

Zuraikat, Malek J. and Faisal I. Rawashdeh. 2019. John Gower's Moral Adaptation of Ovid's "Tale of Actaeon". International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES) 19 (1): 227-238. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.19.1.13

 

Copyright © 2006-2022. All Rights Reserved, Yarmouk University