JJMLL » JJMLL Issues

 

 Jordanian Journals
Home
Editorial Board
International Advisory Board
Scope and Description
Manuscript Submission
Manuscript Organization  
Publication Ethics  
Copyright  
Offprints  
Disclaimer  
JJMLL Issues  
Contact Address

 

      

     
   

Complementizer Agreement in Jordanian Arabic is Agree-based: Evidence from Fronted Objects

 

Abstract

 

This study provides supporting evidence from fronted objects that complementizer agreement (CA) in Jordanian Arabic (JA) is the result of the operation Agree (Chomsky 2000, 2001). The study demonstrates that CA with the local subject in JA can be disrupted only by an active intervening potential goal such as a clitic-left dislocated object as opposed to an inactive focus-fronted object, contra Chomsky’s (2000) Defective Intervener Constraint. The study also shows that C0 and T0 may agree with different goals in JA, suggesting that there is no Φ-feature dependency between C0 and T0.

Keywords: Complementizer Agreement, Jordanian Arabic, Agree, fronted objects, Intervention.

Authors: Atef Alsarayreh

Doi: https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.15.4.3

 

Cited by: Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures (JJMLL) 2023, 15 (4): 1187-1204

 

Full text

 

References

Al-Shawashreh, E. 2016. Aspects of grammatical variation in Jordanian Arabic. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Ph.D. dissertation.

Aoun, Joseph and Elabbas Benmamoun. 1998. Minimality, reconstruction, and PF movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 569-592.

Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas Benmamoun & Lina Choueiri. 2010. The syntax of Arabic. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bakir, Murtadha. 1980. Aspects of clause structure in Arabic. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Benmamoun, Elabbas. 2000. The Feature Structure of Functional Categories: A Comparative Study             of Arabic Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carstens, Vicki. 2000. Concord in Minimalist Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319-55.

Carstens, Vicki. 2003. Rethinking Complementizer Agreement: Agree with a Case-Checked Goal. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 393-412.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. The Movement Nature of Left Dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 397-412.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of -dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71-132. New York: Academic Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in Language, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Demirdache, H. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.

den Besten, Hans. 1977. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Unpublished ms., University of Amsterdam.

den Besten, Hans. 1989. Studies in West Germanic syntax. Tilburg: University of Tilburg dissertation.

El-Yassin, Mohammed. 1985. Basic Word Order in Classical Arabic and Jordanian Arabic. Lingua 65: 197-207.

Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1988. Agreement, binding, and coherence. In Michael Barlow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language, 107-158. Stanford: CSLI.

Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1989. Generalized IP structure, case and VS word order. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 75-113.

Gallego, Ángel J. and Juan Uriagereka. 2007. Conditions on sub-extraction. In Luis Eguren &Olga Fernández Soriano (eds.), Coreference, modality and focus: Studies on the syntax-semantics interface, 45-70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Haegeman, Liliane and Marjo van Koppen. 2012. Complementizer Agreement and the Relation between      C0 and T0. Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 441-454.

Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese. In Ora Matushansky, Albert Costa, Javier Martin-Gonzalez, Lance Nathan & Adam Szczegielniak (eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics 40: Proceedings of HUMIT 2000, 67-80. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Hoekstra, Jan & Laszlo Marácz. 1989. On the Position of Inflection in West Germanic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 75-88.

Jarrah, Marwan. 2019a. A Cartographic Approach to Embedded Word Order in Jordanian Arabic. Folia Linguistica 53 (2): 367-409.

Jarrah, Marwan. 2019b. Record Your Agree: A Case Study of the Arabic Complementizer ʔinn. Journal of Linguistics 55 (1): 83-122.

Jarrah, Marwan. 2020. Complementizer Agreement and the T0-Φ Parameter in Jordanian Arabic. Studia Linguistica 74 (1): 139-164.

Lewis, R. E. 2013. Complementizer agreement in Najdi Arabic. University of Kansas thesis.

Moutaouakil, Ahmed. 1989. Pragmatic functions in a functional grammar of Arabic. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Omari, O. & Branigan, P. 2014. Fin, Force, and Complementizer Agreement in Arabic. A paper presented at the 28th Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, University of Florida.

Ouhalla, Jamal. 1988. The Syntax of head movement. London: University College London dissertation.

Ouhalla, Jamal. 1991. Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge.

Ouhalla, Jamal. 1994a. Verb movement and word order in Arabic. In David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Verb movement, 41-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ouhalla, Jamal. 1994b. Focus in Standard Arabic. Linguistics in Potsdam 1. 65-92.

Ouhalla, Jamal. 1997. Remarks on focus in Standard Arabic. In Mushira Eid and Robert R. Ratcliffe (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics X, 9-45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Plunkett, Bernadette. 1993. The position of subjects in Modern Standard Arabic. In Mushira Eid & Clive Holes (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics V, 231-260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Plunkett, Bernadette. 1996. Binding in Arabic and the lexical clause. In Mushira Eid (ed.), Perspective on Arabic linguistics VIII, 86-97. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Radford, Andrew. 2009. Analysing English sentences: A minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Shlonsky, Ur. 2002. Constituent Questions in Palestinian Arabic. In Jamal Ouhalla & Ur Shlonsky (eds.), Themes in Arabic and Hebrew syntax, 137-159. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Soltan, U. 2007. On Formal Feature Licensing in Minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic Morphosyntax. Maryland: University of Maryland dissertation.

van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen and Marjo van Koppen. 2002. The locality of agreement and the CP-domain. Paper presented at GLOW, University of Amsterdam, April 9-11, 2002.

van Koppen, M. 2005. One probe - two goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.

Watanabe, Akira. 2000. Feature Copying and Binding. Syntax 3: 159-181.

Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1993. Dutch syntax: A minimalist approach. Groningen: University of          Groningen dissertation.

Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1997. Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

 

Copyright © 2006-2022. All Rights Reserved, Yarmouk University